#U he diva vs sylenth1 how to
#U he diva vs sylenth1 software

I look through a similar lens when I look toward the synths in the Arturia collection. Tracks - Where a real Mesa would sound totally wrong in the given context. I love the 'cold' sound of the Line6 'Dual Recto' setting on many electronic based The 'thin', and sometimes harsh qualities imparted by the attempted emulation may well fit a particular track perfectly where the actual amplifier never would. I personally feel that often where an emualtion fails, is often times where something sonically valuable may be borrowed.ДЇor example, with guitar amplifier 'emulations'. Obviously the same may be said of nearly all VI's which attempt to 'emulate' hardware synths - However, the above view seems somehow uniquely true with the Arturia collection. I view them more as rough 'aproxamations'. The Arturia collection is not very strong if one looks for them to be fairly true 'emulations' ~ In fact, they are actually fairly poor 'emulations'. Perhaps, I should say they have their own 'sound'. I have always thought the Arturia synth's sound pretty good. However it seems from your post that you are seeking something different then such a direct comparision. Of course, I admit that if forced to choose which of the virtual synth's at issue in your instant question sounds 'best' - Like many others here would surely agree, the 'Diva' would likely get my opinion. Thanks.I actually like both the Arturia collection and the 'Diva'.

I loved the Sylenth1 demo but concerned that it will never go 64bit for mac. And I don't know what running 8 or so instances of Diva would do to the memory. The Diva however is supposed to sound very good but I'm worried about it's alleged high cpu hit.

#U he diva vs sylenth1 how to

The advantages I see to the V-Collection is that I already know how to program all of them except for the Modular Moog and the SEM. Mainly for the purpose having more instances available for sequencing than my hardware synths (Minimoog, Arp Odyssey, Super Jupiter MKS80, JD900, Prophet VS, Wavestation.etc) can provide in my Logic Studio/MacPro Quad Core setup.

#U he diva vs sylenth1 software

I am looking at analog synth emulation software from U-he and Arturia. The Xils labs stuff also get a lot of praise for their analog synth emulations, maybe you should take a look at them if you haven't already done so. I find that one to be very inspiring and musical. GMediamusic/force or whatever they call themselves these days have Minimonsta of course. It's fantastic, and can do analog emulation stuff fairly well, and in my opinion in a much more musical manner than Diva, and with less of that VA gloss. Sure, I have used some Arturia stuff now and then and I think I did use a pad sound from Diva once, but. Neither of them ever seem to end up on any of my tracks, though. There's something about its sound that just bothers me.ДЇunnily enough, the Arturias do kinda inspire me when I play around with them and are more fun than Diva. What happens is, I usually open an instance of Diva, either flick through some presets or start doing something from scratch, and then a few minutes later I just put it away. And something about the sound of it kinda bothers me. I just don't get any ideas when playing around with it, which is not a good sign. That said, it hasn't exactly got a truckload of mojo, and it's not a synth that inspires me.

You can hear that it's been put together by some highly competent people. Diva oozes class when put next to the somewhat subpar (these days, at least) sound of the Arturias.